Should you put a dental implant right after extraction?

Dental implant placement immediately following tooth extraction is a highly sought-after method for replacing missing teeth. This comprehensive analysis delves into the advantages and important factors to consider when utilizing this technique.

What Are Immediate Dental Implants?

​Immediate dental implants involve placing an implant into the tooth socket immediately after tooth extraction. This technique aims to streamline the treatment process, reduce the number of surgical interventions, and potentially preserve the alveolar bone, the supportive bone surrounding the tooth.

Immediate dental implants offer several advantages:

1. Faster Treatment: Traditional implant placement involves waiting for the extraction site to heal before implant placement. With immediate implants, the implant is inserted immediately, reducing overall treatment time.
2. Preservation of Bone: Immediate implants can potentially help in maintaining the bone structure around the extraction site, which may reduce the need for additional bone grafting procedures.
3. Aesthetics: Immediate implants can lead to improved aesthetics, as the implant can be positioned for optimal appearance right from the start.

However, there are also considerations to keep in mind:

1. Infection and Healing: If there's an infection or significant damage in the extraction site, immediate placement might not be suitable due to the potential risk of implant failure.
2. Soft Tissue Aesthetics: Achieving proper soft tissue healing and gum contour around the implant can be challenging in immediate placements.
3. Implant Stability: Ensuring the implant gains stability in the socket is crucial for successful osseointegration (integration with the bone). Immediate implants may require careful monitoring of stability.

Key Questions Addressed by Research

1. Crestal Bone Resorption: Research suggests that crestal bone loss (bone loss around the implant) may not significantly differ between immediate and delayed placements. Both techniques show comparable results in maintaining bone levels.
2. Soft Tissue Recession: Studies indicate that while immediate placements may initially lead to minor soft tissue recession, it tends to stabilize over time. Both techniques exhibit similar outcomes in terms of tissue recession.
3. Impact of Periapical Infection: Some studies suggest that a history of periapical infection (infection around the tooth's root) doesn't necessarily lead to implant failure in immediate placements. However, careful debridement (cleaning) of the socket is crucial in such cases.
4. Gap Treatment: To address the gap between the implant and bone wall, grafting materials like bovine bone matrix and collagen membranes are often used. This helps fill the space and potentially preserves bone.
5. Implant Stability: Primary implant stability, an important factor for successful osseointegration, is achievable in both immediate and delayed placements. Implants tend to stabilize as they heal.

Immediate dental implant placement can be a suitable option for tooth replacement, offering potential benefits like reduced treatment time and bone preservation. Research suggests that immediate and delayed placements have similar outcomes in terms of bone resorption, soft tissue recession, and implant stability. However, careful patient selection and a thorough evaluation of factors like infection and bone quality are essential for successful outcomes.
As the field continues to evolve, it's essential to consult with your dentist to determine the most appropriate treatment approach based on individual circumstances. Always remember that a personalized assessment is key to making informed decisions about dental implant options.

References

1. Schulte W, Heimke G. [The Tubinger immediate implant] Quintessenz. 1976;27:17–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2. Chen ST, Wilson TG , Hammerle CH. Immediate or early placement of im-plants following tooth extraction: review of biologic basis, clinical procedures, and out-comes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19 Suppl:12–25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
3. Hammerle CH, Chen ST, Wilson TG. Consensus statements and recom-mended clinical procedures regarding the placement of implants in extraction sockets. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19 Suppl:26–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Coulthard P, Worthington HV. The efficacy of vari-ous bone augmentation procedures for dental implants: a Cochrane systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006;21:696–710. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5. Fugazzotto PA. Treatment options following single-rooted tooth removal: a lit-erature review and proposed hierarchy of treatment selection. J Periodontol. 2005;76:821–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:W65–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The longterm efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1986;1:11–25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8. Botticelli D, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Hard-tissue alterations following immediate implant placement in extraction sites. J Clin Periodontol. 2004;31:820–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9. Cangini F, Cornelini R. A comparison between enamel matrix derivative and a bioabsorbable membrane to enhance healing around transmucosal immediate post-extraction implants. J Periodontol. 2005;76:1785–92. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10. Canullo L, Rasperini G. Preservation of peri-implant soft and hard tissues using platform switching of implants placed in immediate extraction sockets: a proof-of-concept study with 12- to 36-month follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22:995–1000. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
11. Cornelini R, Cangini F, Martuscelli G, Wennstrom J. Deproteinized bovine bone and biodegradable barrier membranes to support healing following immediate placement of transmucosal implants: a short-term controlled clinical trial. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2004;24:555–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12. Covani U, Bortolaia C, Barone A, Sbordone L. Bucco-lingual crestal bone changes after immediate and delayed implant placement. J Periodontol. 2004;75:1605–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13. Covani U, Cornelini R, Barone A. Buccal bone augmentation around immediate implants with and without flap elevation: a modified approach. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23:841–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
14. Garcia B, Boronat A, Larrazabal C, Penarrocha M. Immediate implants after the removal of maxillary impacted canines: a clinical series of nine patients. Int J Oral Max-illofac Implants. 2009;24:348–52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
15. Kahnberg KE. Immediate implant placement in fresh extraction sockets: a clini-cal report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24:282–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
16. Raghoebar GM, Slater JJ, Hartog L, Meijer HJ, Vissink A. Comparison of procedures for immediate reconstruction of large osseous defects resulting from removal of a single tooth to prepare for insertion of an endosseous implant after healing. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;38:736–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17. Schropp L, Isidor F, Kostopoulos L, Wenzel A. Patient experience of, and satisfaction with, delayed-immediate vs. delayed single-tooth implant placement. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15:498–503. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
18. Botticelli D, Renzi A, Lindhe J, Berglundh T. Implants in fresh extraction sockets: a prospective 5-year follow-up clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19:1226–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
19. Cafiero C, Annibali S, Gherlone E, Grassi FR, Gualini F, Magliano A. Immediate transmucosal implant placement in molar extraction sites: a 12-month pro-spective multicenter cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19:476–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
20. Calvo-Guirado JL, Ortiz-Ruiz AJ, Lopez-Mari L, Delgado-Ruiz R, Mate-Sanchez J, Bravo Gonzalez LA. Immediate maxillary restoration of single-tooth im-plants using platform switching for crestal bone preservation: a 12-month study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24:275–81. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
21. Cornelini R, Cangini F, Covani U, Wilson TG. Immediate restoration of implants placed into fresh extraction sockets for singletooth replacement: a prospective clinical study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2005;25:439–47. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
22. Del Fabbro M, Boggian C, Taschieri S. Immediate implant placement into fresh extraction sites with chronic periapical pathologic features combined with plasma rich in growth factors: preliminary results of single-cohort study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67:2476–84. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
23. Lindeboom JA, Tjiook Y, Kroon FH. Immediate placement of implants in peri-apical infected sites: a prospective randomized study in 50 patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006;101:705–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
24. Lops D, Chiapasco M, Rossi A, Bressan E, Romeo E. Incidence of inter-proximal papilla between a tooth and an adjacent immediate implant placed into a fresh extraction socket: 1-year prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19:1135–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
25. Villa R, Rangert B. Early loading of interforaminal implants immediately in-stalled after extraction of teeth presenting endodontic and periodontal lesions. Clin Im-plant Dent Relat Res. 2005;7 Suppl 1:S28–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
26. Canullo L, Iurlaro G, Iannello G. Double-blind randomized controlled trial study on post-extraction immediately restored implants using the switching platform concept: soft tissue response. Preliminary report. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:414–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
27. Crespi R, Cappare P, Gherlone E, Romanos GE. Immediate versus delayed loading of dental implants placed in fresh extraction sockets in the maxillary esthetic zone: a clinical comparative study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23:753–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
28. Schropp L, Kostopoulos L, Wenzel A, Isidor F. Clinical and radiographic per-formance of delayed-immediate single-tooth implant placement associated with peri-implant bone defects. A 2-year prospective, controlled, randomized follow-up report. J Clin Periodontol. 2005;32:480–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
29. Block MS, Mercante DE, Lirette D, Mohamed W, Ryser M, Castellon P. Pro-spective evaluation of immediate and delayed provisional single tooth restorations. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67:89–107. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
30. Palattella P, Torsello F, Cordaro L. Two-year prospective clinical comparison of immediate replacement vs. immediate restoration of single tooth in the esthetic zone. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19:1148–53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
31. Chen ST, Darby IB, Reynolds EC. A prospective clinical study of non-submerged immediate implants: clinical outcomes and esthetic results. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18:552–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
32. Crespi R, Cappare P, Gherlone E, Romanos GE. Immediate occlusal loading of implants placed in fresh sockets after tooth extraction. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22:955–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
33. Lang NP, Tonetti MS, Suvan JE, Pierre Bernard J, Botticelli D, Fourmousis I. Immediate implant placement with transmucosal healing in areas of aesthetic priority. A multicentre randomizedcontrolled clinical trial I. Surgical outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18:188–96. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
34. Ribeiro FS, Pontes AE, Marcantonio E, Piattelli A, Neto RJ, Marcantonio E. Success rate of immediate nonfunctional loaded single-tooth implants: immediate versus delayed implantation. Implant Dent. 2008;17:109–17. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
35. Siciliano VI, Salvi GE, Matarasso S, Cafiero C, Blasi A, Lang NP. Soft tissues healing at immediate transmucosal implants placed into molar extraction sites with buc-cal self-contained dehiscences. A 12-month controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:482–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
36. Siegenthaler DW, Jung RE, Holderegger C, Roos M, Hammerle CH. Replacement of teeth exhibiting periapical pathology by immediate implants: a prospective, controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18:727–37. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
37. Vanden Bogaerde L, Rangert B, Wendelhag I. Immediate/early function of Branemark System TiUnite implants in fresh extraction sockets in maxillae and posterior mandibles: an 18-month prospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2005;7 Suppl 1:S121–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
38. Quirynen M, Van Assche N, Botticelli D, Berglundh T. How does the timing of implant placement to extraction affect outcome? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22 Suppl:203–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
39. Chen ST, Beagle J, Jensen SS, Chiapasco M, Darby I. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding surgical techniques. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24 Suppl:272–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
40. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Kwan S, Worthington HV, Coulthard P. Interven-tions for replacing missing teeth: bone augmentation techniques for dental implant treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;3:CD003607. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]